<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Depth-First: Tag chemblogs</title>
    <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/tag/chemblogs</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Walking the Web of Chemical Informatics</description>
    <item>
      <title>Open Access Business Models That Can Actually Work: Sigma-Aldrich's ChemBlogs</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://flickr.com/photos/angela7/506936851/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://depth-first.com/demo/20071011/chainbridge.jpg" align="right"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A gem of a chemistry blog has been operating for some time - apparently without much notice. &lt;a href="http://chemblogs.com/sial_blog/"&gt;ChemBlogs&lt;/a&gt; is Sigma-Aldrich's Web answer to their &lt;a href="http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/Brands/Aldrich/Aldrichimica_Acta.html"&gt;Aldrichimica Acta&lt;/a&gt; print magazine, and it's packed with mini-reviews on synthetic chemistry with links to the primary literature. This approach to scientific marketing has so much potential, I can't imagine why others aren't doing it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, there are some small things that could be done to make ChemBlogs a lot more effective. Here, in no particular order, are some suggestions:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Submit the RSS feed to Chemical Blogspace.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://cb.openmolecules.net/posts.php"&gt;Chemical Blogspace&lt;/a&gt; is perhaps the most widely-read aggregator of free chemistry content on the Web. And it's one of the best ways to get your chemistry blog noticed, bookmarked, and linked to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Make it easier to discover and use a post's permalink.&lt;/strong&gt; If I see an article I like in ChemBlogs, such as &lt;a href="http://chemblogs.com/sial_blog/index.php?blog=2&amp;amp;title=chem_gem_chloro_triphenylphosphine_gold_&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1"&gt;this one on gold catalysis&lt;/a&gt;, there's no obvious way for me to link to it in my own blog. Standard practice is that all titles on the front page are hyperlinked to the article's permalink. &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/03/designing-the-obvious-permalinks-and-paradigms"&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; discusses the importance of permalinks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Don't moderate comments - use reCAPTCHA instead.&lt;/strong&gt; Nothing stifles online discussion like moderated comments. The Web is about immediacy. Make a change and see it live instantly. Everything else is so 1999. If spam is the concern, &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/18/six-reasons-i-like-recaptcha-or-how-to-build-a-web-service-worth-talking-about"&gt;reCAPTCHA&lt;/a&gt; is a wonderful tool for the job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Drop the company group when identifying authors.&lt;/strong&gt; No reader cares whether Sharbil J. Firsan is part of the Marketing Group or not. In fact, it's a bit of a turn-off to have the word "Marketing" appear at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Each author should have an online bio that links to their name.&lt;/strong&gt; Although titles and company divisions are not useful, other information about authors is. In a multi-author blog like ChemBlogs, the byline should hyperlink to a bio of the author, or a collection of their writing. This makes it easier for readers to follow authors they like.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to the primary literature via DOI.&lt;/strong&gt; ChemBlogs cites many articles appearing in journals, which is a great thing. Unfortunately, there's no way for a search engine to know that this is happening. The simple fix is to hyperlink a literature citation to the DOI entry, like this one for &lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr00032a009"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chem. Rev.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;1994&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;em&gt;94&lt;/em&gt;, 2483-2547&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Include InChIs for all important structures.&lt;/strong&gt; Free tools like &lt;a href="http://inchimatic.com"&gt;InChIMatic&lt;/a&gt; can then be used to quickly find articles dealing with those molecules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Post more frequently and/or regularly.&lt;/strong&gt; More content means more eyeballs. When it's regularly posted, readers know when to expect it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Invite some working scientists to write articles.&lt;/strong&gt; If recent experience with &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2006/09/08/chemical-reviews-on-wikipedia"&gt;Wikipedia and Chemistry&lt;/a&gt; is any guide, there are plenty of capable scientist more than willing to create free, high-quality compound monographs and other chemical content. Invite some of them to contribute very short articles for ChemBlogs in their area of expertise and see what happens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Release all content under a &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/"&gt;Creative Commons License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt; Information wants to be free - why not make it free? Allowing ChemBlogs' content to spread far and wide just makes it that much more visible. For example, at last count, Depth-First content was reproduced on about a dozen other Web sites, including one &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/08/31/cheminformatics-in-korean-an-example-of-scientific-self-organization"&gt;in Korean&lt;/a&gt;. This matches my goals exactly, and it's all perfectly legal thanks to the way the content is licensed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With a little tweaking, Sigma-Aldrich's experiment in &lt;a href="http://www.sethgodin.com/permission/"&gt;Permission Marketing&lt;/a&gt; could pay off - for everyone. Readers would conveniently get useful bits of information to make them more productive. The Internet would get new, high-quality chemical content - free to use and link to. Who knows - this might even become an &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/07/16/go-west-young-man-does-open-access-really-matter-in-the-long-run"&gt;Open Access business model&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/08/07/yale-university-libraries-cancel-biomed-central-membership-in-the-face-of-spiraling-costs"&gt;actually  works&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And Sigma-Aldrich would have a far more effective marketing tool than anything else they currently use. With the possible exception of the &lt;a href="http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/cgi-bin/hsrun/Suite7/Suite/Suite.hjx;start=Suite.HsEgrailForm.run?FormName=AldrichHandbook0708_87244"&gt;Handbook&lt;/a&gt;, but even that could change.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Image Credit: &lt;a href="http://flickr.com/photos/angela7/"&gt;angela7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:56967cba-05c5-4cb1-b748-2dde1a8beb65</guid>
      <author>Rich Apodaca</author>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/11/open-access-business-models-that-can-actually-work-sigma-aldrichs-chemblogs</link>
      <category>Open X</category>
      <category>openaccess</category>
      <category>sigma</category>
      <category>aldrich</category>
      <category>chemblogs</category>
      <category>businessmodels</category>
      <category>blogs</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
