<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Depth-First: Can Your Cheminformatics Tool Do This?</title>
    <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/02/can-your-cheminformatics-tool-do-this</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Walking the Web of Chemical Informatics</description>
    <item>
      <title>Can Your Cheminformatics Tool Do This?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol071276f"&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://depth-first.com/demo/20071002/binol.png"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:6a257c65-0081-485d-b624-5aa282ba0e66</guid>
      <author>Rich Apodaca</author>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/02/can-your-cheminformatics-tool-do-this</link>
      <category>Tools</category>
      <category>axialchirality</category>
      <category>flexmol</category>
      <category>binol</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Can Your Cheminformatics Tool Do This?" by Rich Apodaca</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Joerg, good questions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/tag/flexmol" rel="nofollow"&gt;FlexMol&lt;/a&gt; is a superset of molfile, SMILES, InChI, and CML in that it can encode any molecule those formats can, and many others as well. I haven't found any exceptions in the last few years of actively looking. I'm not as familiar w/ mol2.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for efficiency, that depends on the implementation. So far, there is only one, the &lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/tag/octet" rel="nofollow"&gt;Octet Framework&lt;/a&gt;. Octet was written a few years ago now, and there are many things I don't like about it as a toolkit. It could no doubt be made more efficient. But it does fully support FlexMol.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can convert SMILES and Molfiles into FlexMol. Within certain limits, you can also convert them back. You can do query atom searches and stereo-substructure searches on FlexMol representations. In addition to precisely representing metallocenes, piano stool complexes, planar chiral organometallics, and allene, helicine, and biaryl stereochemistry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It comes at a price. FlexMol can be very verbose. It can be misused. It's hard to write readers and writers. But it does work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:5738568c-f25a-4c2b-9d84-21519240a6df</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/02/can-your-cheminformatics-tool-do-this#comment-195</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Can Your Cheminformatics Tool Do This?" by Joerg Kurt Wegner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Lets assume that FlexMol can do all of this ... is there already enough "open standard" available to encode it as superset of mol, mol2, and cml files?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After this question is solved, are things still efficient enough for being usable for millions of molecules?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:ba39036f-5b5e-4425-9089-e544a7373b1b</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/02/can-your-cheminformatics-tool-do-this#comment-194</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Can Your Cheminformatics Tool Do This?" by Rich Apodaca</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Antony,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm asking about representing the axial chirality of the binol in such a way that its enantiomers can be distinguished by a computer program.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/tag/axialchirality" rel="nofollow"&gt;Axial chirality&lt;/a&gt; is one of those things that cheminformatics hasn't really come to grips with yet. But nobody told the Organic Chemists that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9e98fa77-a1d2-4ffd-a332-f9bcdb94eb85</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/02/can-your-cheminformatics-tool-do-this#comment-192</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Can Your Cheminformatics Tool Do This?" by ChemSpiderMan</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What do you want to do? Just redraw the reaction?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:ea8ef80d-1d9d-485f-af7c-ffc63317aab7</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/10/02/can-your-cheminformatics-tool-do-this#comment-190</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
