<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Depth-First: Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0</title>
    <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Walking the Web of Chemical Informatics</description>
    <item>
      <title>Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_page.aspx?ar=2041&amp;amp;l2=17&amp;amp;l3=104&amp;amp;srid=17"&gt;&lt;img src="http://depth-first.com/demo/20070905/graph.png"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Web 2.0 may be &lt;a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html"&gt;all about participation&lt;/a&gt;, but the &lt;a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_page.aspx?ar=2041&amp;amp;l2=17&amp;amp;l3=104&amp;amp;srid=17"&gt;numbers&lt;/a&gt; reported by &lt;a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com"&gt;The McKinsey Quarterly&lt;/a&gt; suggest a self-selecting oligarchy rather than a democracy. Success may well depend more on engaging the top 2-10% of users rather than appealing to all of them. Food for though when forming your next community, be it electronic or otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;image credit: &lt;a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com"&gt;The McKinsey Quarterly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:1ba4dc54-4c50-4dbc-bf39-c25abe642998</guid>
      <author>Rich Apodaca</author>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0</link>
      <category>Web</category>
      <category>web20</category>
      <category>participation</category>
      <category>oligarchy</category>
      <category>socialnetworking</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0" by Steve Harold - Hypnosis Mp3s</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have heard of the 20/80 rule where for example 80% of your business comes from 20% of your clients. I am not surprised at the 2-10% data as there are so many Web 2.0 sites. Which ones to choose when you get different friends and colleagues inviting you to many different social sites&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:16:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:49318e04-b0e9-4e8b-8381-61f945bc46e3</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0#comment-437</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0" by Joerg Kurt Wegner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is something interesting saying the same ... only a few make the most contributions 
&lt;a href="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:41:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2e9ad54c-add6-4b85-bb5b-92478bd1b7fc</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0#comment-153</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0" by Rich Apodaca</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Geoff,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your comments about this effect in open source remind me of the article &lt;a href="http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/12/11/myths.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Myths Open Source Developers Tell Ourselves&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:56:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:5bdaa92e-42f1-466c-afbf-5a13ef3bc48f</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0#comment-151</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0" by Geoff Hutchison</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I've heard this long described as the "ten-percent rule," well before the beginnings of the web, much less Web 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other times, we refer to these people as "early adopters." If you've  read Malcom Gladwell's &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Tipping Point&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, you might call these people "&lt;a href="http://www.wikisummaries.org/The_Tipping_Point" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Law of the Few&lt;/a&gt;."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I bet if you take any e-mail list, you'll see that at most 10% of the  readers are active contributors. The same goes for open source  projects -- how many users are there compared to active developers?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately Google is disappointing me -- I can't find references  to the rule, but I first heard it 10 years ago or more.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:06:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e7937bcd-99b0-471e-9bc4-1e9720d3e4fd</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0#comment-146</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Name That Graph Revealed: Oligarchy 2.0" by baoilleach</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey come on! They have approximated a curve by a point. How could we have guessed that? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:30:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:29750446-3332-498a-ab02-d3b4b5bbc7bd</guid>
      <link>http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/09/05/name-that-graph-revealed-oligarchy-2-0#comment-143</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
